advanced search

11 matches for 'supreme court'

• Washington Times Op-Ed on McDonald

  —Snowflakes in Hell

  The Washington Times seems to be a bit nervous about the idea of McDonald, not for gun reasons but because of how it might be incorporated: Many have heard about the historic gun rights case going to the Supreme Court. Fewer have heard that this is also a major case for [...]

  Fetched: December 13, 2009, 7:14pm EST
  

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Snowflakes in Hell' this week

• [2 Political Junkies] Post-Gazette repeats old myth

  —PolitickerPA

  When can we finally retire the urban legend repeated in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette today? Namely this:
  The debate puts the first-term senator in an uncomfortable place. His father, former Pennsylvania Gov. Robert P. Casey, challenged Roe v. Wade to the Supreme Court and was infamously denied a chance to [...]

  Posted: December 07, 2009, 11:11am EST
  by lupinaccim@aol.com (Maria)

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'PolitickerPA' this week

• Court Date Set for McDonald

  —Snowflakes in Hell

  March 2nd, 2010. I will be there, outside the Supreme Court building. I won't miss this one like I did Heller. Related posts:Date Set for Oral Arguments in HellerNew DC Gun LawSupreme Dictator' [...]

  Fetched: November 30, 2009, 10:48pm EST
  

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Snowflakes in Hell' this week

• PA Supreme Court denies Lokuta pay and benefits…

  —GrassrootsPA

  Number of comments: 20
  

  PA Supreme Court denies Lokuta pay and benefits…

  
  

  [...]

  Posted: November 24, 2009, 11:38pm EST
  by GrassrootsPA

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'GrassrootsPA' this week

• Separation of Powers

  —Snowflakes in Hell

  Orin Kerr over at the Volokh Conspiracy takes a negative view of briefs filed at the Supreme Court by legislators: Amicus briefs written on behalf of sitting legislators strike me as inappropriate. Of course, legislators can influence the judicial process in many ways. They write the legislation that the courts interpret; [...]

  Fetched: November 24, 2009, 2:17pm EST
  

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Snowflakes in Hell' this week

• Support for McDonald from Mordor

  —Snowflakes in Hell

  Chuck Michel is reporting that: Today, 34 California District Attorneys and 8 Nevada District Attorneys joined a consortium of other “friends of the court” to file an “amicus” brief in the United States Supreme Court in the cases ofMcDonald v. Chicago (08-1521) and NRA v. Chicago (08-1497). Both cases ask the Supreme [...]

  Fetched: November 23, 2009, 8:51pm EST
  

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Snowflakes in Hell' this week

• House Gaming Oversight Committee Chair seeks Casino association’s official status…

  —GrassrootsPA

  Number of comments: 20
  

  House Gaming Oversight Committee Chair seeks Casino association’s official status…

  Headed by former Supreme Court Justice Stephen A. Zappala…

  
  

  [...]

  Posted: November 19, 2009, 1:54pm EST
  by GrassrootsPA

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'GrassrootsPA' this week

• More on the Missouri Supreme Court Decision

  —Snowflakes in Hell

  I had a nagging feeling that I had read about the topic of my previous post, intoxicated possession at home, before. Sure enough, managed to find this in Eugene Volokh's Law Review article that discusses a framework for implementing the Second Amendment (Original post at Volokh.com here): Many states bar possession [...]

  Fetched: November 18, 2009, 11:47am EST
  

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Snowflakes in Hell' this week

• Today’s Blogmarks

  —New Trommetter Times

  Supreme Court refuses to hear Redskins’ naming case
  The Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of Native American activists who claimed that the Washington Redskins‘ team name is so [...]

  Posted: November 16, 2009, 10:31pm EST
  by Jason

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'New Trommetter Times' this week

• We Took Your Land, Now Go Away

  —Suburban Guerrilla

  Well! I guess it depends on who you ask:

  The Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive a lawsuit on behalf of Native American activists who claimed that the Washington Redskins’ team name is so offensive that it does not deserve trademark protection.

  The court without comment refused to get involved [...]

  Posted: November 16, 2009, 10:56am EST
  by Susie

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'Suburban Guerrilla' this week

• CF in the Blogs

  —POLICY BLOG

  Here are some recent CF mentions in the blogosphere

  PointOfLaw.com and National Review Online - feature a CF preview of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court election
  Seen Through a Glass, No PLCB, and Pennsylvania Winery and Hospitality Lawyer weigh in on our study on the impact of [...]

  Posted: November 13, 2009, 10:50am EST
  by Commonwealth Foundation

  — about this blog

  — blogs linking 'POLICY BLOG' this week